bitarch.dev
AI Engineering

Why "Just Vibing" Isn't Enough: The Case for Guided Vibe Coding

AI can write code at the speed of light, but it takes a human Architect to build something that lasts.

Dhruba Baishya
Dhruba Baishya
Software Architect
Jan 30, 2026
6 min read

We've entered the era of "Vibe Coding"—where you describe what you want, and an AI generates the implementation. It’s intoxicatingly fast. But if you’ve ever tried to build a production-ready application this way, you’ve likely hit a wall.

The AI is an eager junior developer: it knows how to write code, but it doesn't always know why. It lacks taste, context, and foresight. This is where Guided Vibe Coding comes in. You can't just let the AI drive; you have to be the Navigator, the Architect, and the Editor.

The "Good Enough" Trap

Standard vibe coding defaults to the path of least resistance. It produces generic, "safe" results. Without guidance, your app looks like a Bootstrap template and performs like a prototype.

Here are some scenarios that demonstrate why active engineering guidance is critical—we must steer the AI to produce the most suitable application, not just the fastest one.

1. Architectural Intent: The Stack

Building a solution isn't about choosing the "best" tool in a vacuum; it’s about choosing what fits the solution best. We have a universe of tools, but chasing the newest shiny object often leads to over-engineering. We prioritized team sustainability and running costs over "hype."

For example, if you ask an AI to "fetch data," it will likely give you a `useEffect` and `fetch`. It works, but it's fragile.

The Guidance: You need to explicitly direct the architecture: "Use TanStack Query for server state and Zustand for client state."

The AI is a powerful coder, but it defaults to the simplest implementation. By guiding it towards robust, battle-tested libraries, you ensure your app scales beyond the prototype phase.

2. The Automation Advantage: OpenAPI

A common mistake is letting the AI manually type out your API responses. It’s tedious and prone to drift.

The Guidance: Instead of prompting "Create a TypeScript interface for the user endpoint," guide the process: "Use openapi-generator-cli to generate the client from the backend spec."

This keeps your frontend and backend strictly in sync without you—or the AI—ever having to guess a type definition. It turns a maintenance headache into an automated workflow.

3. The Cosmetic Eye: UI Polish

AI defaults to standard "safe" UI: borders, shadows, and generous padding.

The Guidance: To achieve a premium look, you have to push against the default: "No borders. Flat design. Tiny radius." The AI executes the changes instantly, but the taste comes from you.

4. The Performance Guardrail: RLS

AI writes functionally correct SQL, but often misses performance nuances. For example, it might use `auth.uid()` in a Row Level Security policy.

The Guidance: However, in Postgres, this simple policy re-evaluates for every single row. The fix? "Wrap that in a sub-select `(select auth.uid())` to force single evaluation." One guided sentence saves your database CPU.

5. The Pattern Playbook: Design Patterns

Left to its own devices, AI tends to write procedural, imperative code. It works, but it’s often rigid. To achieve accelerated development, enhanced code quality, and reusability, you must guide it toward established Design Patterns.

The Scenario: For example, let's say we need a feature that behaves differently based on the rollout phase or specific client needs. The AI starts writing a massive block of `if-else` statements.

The Guidance: "Use the Strategy Pattern here. Define a common interface. Implement `PhaseOneStrategy` and `CustomClientStrategy` separately, and let us inject the correct one dynamically at runtime."

This approach allows us to switch logic strategies without touching the core codebase—whether for a phased release or a bespoke client solution. It turns a potential refactoring nightmare into a clean, additive process.

6. The Synthesis Engine: Options over Answers

Sometimes we don't need a single answer; we need options. We might be stuck on a problem or weighing trade-offs. AI drastically reduces the effort of navigating the internet by synthesizing different approaches from multiple models.

The Context: We often face situations where there are multiple ways to solve a problem. Instead of asking "How do I do X?", we ask "Give me 3 approaches to solve X with pros and cons."

The Guidance: We can then evaluate which path fits our specific constraints. Guided Vibe Coding isn't just about generation; it's about using AI to break through mental blocks and explore the solution space effectively.

7. The Holistic Architect: Beyond the Code

Solution building is not just about writing application code. It requires a deep understanding of the entire software delivery lifecycle: Developer Experience (DX), Code Quality, Automation, Observability, and Operations.

The Reality: A generated script might work, but is it deployable? Is it observant? Is it resilient?

The Guidance: We must guide the AI to build for the whole lifecycle. "Add structured logging. Ensure this is injectable via environment variables. Create a GitHub Action for testing." Engineering oversight is essential to enforce these non-functional requirements, ensuring the solution is robust, resilient, and cost-effective.

Conclusion

Vibe coding is a superpower, but it’s not an autopilot. To get the best out of it, you need to know what good looks like. You need to catch the "lazy" refactors, the "safe" UI choices, and the "functional but slow" database queries.

Be the Architect. Let the AI be the builder. That is Guided Vibe Coding.

Read More from the Author